![]() Il faudrait pousser la recherche et le débat pour définir un modèle éthique qui convienne à la santé publique. Interprétation : Le modèle de déontologie clinique ne convient pas à la santé publique, car le type de raisonnement employé pour les questions éthiques en santé publique peut être différent de celui des sciences empiriques. Résultats : Nous avons cerné quatre principes (réduction des méfaits, choix des moyens les moins restrictifs, réciprocité et transparence) et fourni deux exemples de leur application dans la pratique. Méthode : Analyse notionnelle et enquête bibliographique. Objectifs : Étudier les principes d'un débat éthique en santé publique. Further research and debate on the appropriate ethics for public health are required. Interpretation: The paper illustrates how clinical ethics is not an appropriate model for public health ethics and argues that the type of reasoning involved in public health ethics may be at potential variance from that of empirical science. Two examples of how the principles are applied in practice are provided. Results: Four principles are identified: The Harm Principle, The Principle of Least Restrictive Means, The Reciprocity Principle, and The Transparency Principle. Undeniably this phenomenon is a reflection or outgrowth of the Park Geun-hye government’s labeling of unification bonanza or grand. idea that great powers have the right to send armies into countries where there are revolutions to restore legitimate governments. Unification - a perennial topic of discussion among political scientists - has now become an interest of investors. Methods: Conceptual analysis and literature review. Download PDF file of 'Five Theories of Unification' 328kb. ![]() Objectives: The objective of this paper is to discuss principles relevant to ethical deliberation in public health. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |